Somatic DNA alterations in endometriosis: High frequency of chromosome 17 and p53 loss in late-stage endometriosis Conference

cited authors

  • Bischoff, FZ; Heard, M; Simpson, JL

fiu authors


  • Problem: Genetic predisposition to endometriosis is well established, but the gene(s) involved largely remain unknown. Although endometriosis is considered a benign disease, it displays several features similar to malignancy: altered morphology, disregulated growth, invasion. We hypothesize endometriosis arises as result of somatic DNA alterations occurring in a multi-step process, analogous to origin of neoplasia. Since chromosome 17 and TP53 tumor suppressor gene (TSG) alterations occur frequently in premalignant and malignant tissues, including endometrial and ovarian epithelial carcinomas, we sought to determine if similar somatic changes occur in late stage endometriosis. Method of study: To determine the frequencies of monosomy for chromosome 17, as well as for perturbations of p53 and other loci on 17, two different approaches were used. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was used to detect monosomy for the 17 centromere and for the p53 locus. For FISH, archival tissue (n=6) and fresh endometriotic touch preparations were prepared from women (n=8) undergoing extirpation of advanced stage endometriosis. Direct-labeled probes specific for p53 (17p13.1) and for the chromosome 17 alpha-satellite centromere region (1711.1-q11.1) were used to compare single glandular and stromal cells from endometriosis and normal tissue. DNA analysis of polymorphic DNA loci were used to detect loss of heterozygosity (LoH) for other loci on 17. We assessed matched endometriotic and normal DNA (peripheral blood) from women with severe/late stage disease (n=15), studying these dinucleotide markers: HGH (located on 17q22-24), D17S250 (17q11.2-q12) and CHRNB1 (17p13.1). Results: Loss of the chromosome 17 centromere (monosomy) was shown by FISH in some cells from all 14 endometriosis specimens, although in no case did every cell show monosomy 17. In 12 of 14 specimens, significant proportions of cells not only were monosomic for the chromosome 17-centromere (8 to 42% of cells) but also showed loss of p53 locus. In the two remaining cases, p53 loss alone was observed in 8 and 14%. LoH for other alleles on chromosome 17 was observed less often, namely only 3 of 15 specimens for HGH, 1 of 15 for D17S250, and 0 of 15 for CHRNB1. Conclusions: Our study indicates that perturbations of chromosome 17 in general and the p53 locus in particular occur frequently in severe/late stage endometriosis. That not all cells show loss of whole chromosome 17 or the p53 locus suggests somatic mutation, perhaps occurring late in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Clonal evolution of endometriosis must depend not only on somatic mutations for p53 but also on other oncogenes or TSG. Alternatively, the clone could begin with a germline or somatic mutation involving a nonneoplastic process, followed by one or more somatic mutations involving an oncogene or TSG like p53. Additional candidate genes clearly must be evaluated in order to determine the precise role chromosome 17 and p53 alterations play in endometriosis; however, additional genes seem unlikely to involve region connoted by HGH, D17S250 or CHRNB1. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

publication date

  • June 24, 2002

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

start page

  • 49

end page

  • 64


  • 55


  • 1-2